I've been on several flights in the past several days and I brought along a a few books. I finally finished Paulo Coelho's The Alchemist, which is rich with quotable phrases. The second book is stimulating my thoughts in a way that hurts, in a good way. I picked up Soren Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling several months ago, but am just now getting to it. And boy, it's dense. This passage has me pondering...
So the knight makes the movement–but what movement? Will he
forget the whole thing? (For in this too there is indeed a kind of
concentration.) No! For the knight does not contradict himself, and it is a
contradiction to forget the whole content of one's life and yet remain the same
man. To become another man he feels no inclination, nor does he by any means
regard this as greatness. Only the lower natures forget themselves and become
something new. Thus the butterfly has entirely forgotten that it was a caterpillar,
perhaps it may in turn so entirely forget it was a butterfly that it becomes a
fish. The deeper natures never forget themselves and never become anything else
than what they were. So the knight remembers everything, but precisely this
remembrance is pain, and yet by the infinite resignation he is reconciled with
existence. Love for that princess became for him the expression for an eternal
love, assumed a religious character, was transfigured into a love for the
Eternal Being, which did to be sure deny him the fulfillment of his love, yet
reconciled him again by the eternal consciousness of its validity in the form
of eternity, which no reality can take from him. Fools and young men prate
about everything being possible for a man. That, however, is a great error.
Spiritually speaking, everything is possible, but in the world of the finite
there is much which is not possible. This impossible, however, the knight makes
possible by expressing it spiritually, but he expresses it spiritually by
waiving his claim to it. The wish which would carry him out into reality, but
was wrecked upon the impossibility, is now bent inward, but it is not therefore
lost, neither is it forgotten. At one moment it is the obscure emotion of the
wish within him which awakens recollections, at another moment he awakens them
himself; for he is too proud to be willing that what was the whole content of
his life should be the thing of a fleeting moment. He keeps this love young,
and along with him it increases in years and in beauty. On the other hand, he
has no need of the intervention of the finite for the further growth of his
love. From the instant he made the movement the princess is lost to him. He has
no need of those erotic tinglings in the nerves at the sight of the beloved
etc., nor does he need to be constantly taking leave of her in a finite sense,
because he recollects her in an eternal sense, and he knows very well that the
lovers who are so bent upon seeing "her" yet once again, to say farewell
for the last time, are right in being bent upon it, are right in thinking that
it is the last time, for they forget one another the soonest. He has
comprehended the deep secret that also in loving another person one must be
sufficient unto oneself. He no longer takes a finite interest in what the
princess is doing, and precisely this is proof that he has made the movement
infinitely. Here one may have an opportunity to see whether the movement on the
part of a particular person is true or fictitious. There was one who also believed
that he had made the movement; but lo, time passed, the princess did something
else, she married–a prince, let us say–then his soul lost the elasticity of
resignation. Thereby he knew that he had not made the movement rightly; for he
who has made the act of resignation infinitely is sufficient unto himself. The
knight does not annul his resignation, he preserves his love just as young as
it was in its first moment, he never lets it go from him, precisely because he
makes the movements infinitely. What the princess does, cannot disturb him, it
is only the lower natures which find in other people the law for their actions,
which find the premises for their actions outside themselves. If on the other
hand the princess is like-minded, the beautiful consequence will be apparent.
She will introduce herself into that order of knighthood into which one is not
received by balloting, but of which everyone is a member who has courage to
introduce himself, that order of knighthood which proves its immortality by the
fact that it makes no distinction between man and woman. The two will preserve
their love young and sound, she also will have triumphed over her pains, even
though she does not, as it is said in the ballad, "lie every night beside
her lord." These two will to all eternity remain in agreement with one
another, with a well-timed harmonia praestabilita, so that if ever the moment
were to come, the moment which does not, however, concern them finitely (for
then they would be growing older), if ever the moment were to come which
offered to give love its expression in time, then they will be capable of
beginning precisely at the point where they would have begun if originally they
had been united. He who understands this, be he man or woman, can never be deceived,
for it is only the lower natures which imagine they were deceived. No girl who
is not so proud really knows how to love; but if she is so proud, then the
cunning and shrewdness of all the world cannot deceive her.
No comments:
Post a Comment